For hiring teams
We run scientific search for biotech companies in the US, UK, and Europe. That includes field mapping, sourcing, CV review, structured screening, and shortlist notes that explain why each candidate made it through.
Shortlisted in 18 days.
Early-stage biotech startups call us when the hire is too important for surface-level search. We understand the science, look beyond titles, and find the people whose experience actually fits the problem.
These are the areas we know best. If your brief sits between categories, we know how to read it and where to search.
Most recruiters send you CVs and ask you to decide. We do the work first. You review 3–5 candidates, each with a brief. You make one call.
No intake form. Before we speak, we read your papers, patents, and preprints. We map your domain ourselves. When we talk, we skip the basics and go straight to the scientific gap you're trying to close.
We map the publication landscape in your exact subdomain. Who's advancing it, who's stalled, who has the scientific lineage your problem requires. Most recruiters search LinkedIn. We search the field.
We assess every candidate using 50+ observable signals across six dimensions: domain, execution, autonomy, trajectory, collaboration, and stage fit.
Every candidate goes through a scientific interview. We ask the questions only a specialist would ask: where their curiosity lives, how deep they go, and how they think through failure.
3 to 5 candidates, each with a written brief: domain fit, execution profile, stage fit, and an honest recommendation. We stay in the process, keep the candidate warm, flag risks early, and make sure the close doesn’t break on logistics.
Most recruiters send you CVs and ask you to decide. We do the work first so by the time a name reaches you, the hard thinking is already done. You review 3 to 5 candidates. Each with a brief. You make one call.
No intake form. Before we speak, we read your papers, patents, and preprints. We map your domain ourselves. When we talk, we skip the basics and go straight to the scientific gap you're trying to close.
We map the publication landscape in your exact subdomain. Who's advancing it, who's stalled, who has the scientific lineage your problem requires. Most recruiters search LinkedIn. We search the field.
We assess every candidate using 50+ observable signals across six dimensions: domain, execution, autonomy, trajectory, collaboration, and stage fit.
Every candidate goes through a scientific interview. We ask the questions only a specialist would ask: where their curiosity lives, how deep they go, and how they think through failure.
3 to 5 candidates, each with a written brief: domain fit, execution profile, stage fit, and an honest recommendation. We stay in the process, keep the candidate warm, flag risks early, and make sure the close doesn’t break on logistics.
Generalists pattern-match tidy CVs. We read the science, the trajectory, and the obsession underneath it. That changes who survives the search.
San Francisco, CA • sarah.chen@example.com • github.com/schen-bio
Self-directed research and development.
Built her own pathway library. Solo, funded, shipped.
Chased a specific metabolic problem. Scientific conviction, not instability.
Publication velocity compounds — this is a force multiplier.
Sent with a 4-page brief. Hired immediately.
San Francisco, CA • sarah.chen@example.com • github.com/schen-bio
Self-directed research and development.
No context in CV. Looks like a red flag.
Short tenure at only industry role. Flight risk.
Publication-heavy background. Might not move at startup speed.
Didn't pass initial recruiter screen.
Sourcing, screening, scoring, interviewing — done before you see a single name. You get a shortlist of 3 to 5 scientists, each with a written brief. Your job is to make one decision, not run a search.
By day 18, you already have a vetted shortlist with interview notes. Most searches are still sourcing.
No salary, no retainer. You pay only when you hire.
We are specialists who have seen this industry from every side. We have worked in labs, operated in the venture and startup world, and sat in the interview chair ourselves as candidates. We are not generalist HR recruiters trying to fill technical roles from the outside. We understand the science, the pressure candidates are under, and the realities of building an early-stage company because we have lived much closer to that world ourselves.
This is not a broad recruitment practice with a biotech page added to it. We stay close to the field by keeping up with new papers, lab science, and the shifts shaping the market, so our understanding stays current. That helps us read real signal, understand complex roles, and find talent beyond obvious titles.
We believe respectful, empathetic hiring is a competitive advantage. When candidates feel understood and treated seriously, the process becomes stronger, trust builds earlier, and retention improves because the match is made with care instead of pressure.
“We built Affinity on two beliefs: specialist knowledge wins better searches, and humane, empathetic hiring creates better retention. The way a candidate is treated during the process shapes whether they join, and whether they stay.”
Founder, Affinity Talent.
Search Visibility
Affinity Talent is a boutique biotech recruiting firm working with early-stage and growth-stage biotech teams hiring scientists and technical operators across computational biology, synthetic biology, platform biology, AI drug discovery, functional genomics, and translational research.
We help biotech startups and scientific leaders who need a specialist biotech recruiter rather than a generalist agency. That usually means searches where the brief is technical, the candidate pool is small, and the cost of hiring the wrong person is much higher than the cost of waiting one extra week for the right shortlist.
We run scientific search for biotech companies in the US, UK, and Europe. That includes field mapping, sourcing, CV review, structured screening, and shortlist notes that explain why each candidate made it through.
We also work with scientists exploring computational biology, synthetic biology, drug discovery, and platform science opportunities. Public roles live on our job board, and candidates can join the shortlist for searches that stay confidential.
The strongest fit is usually an early-stage or scaling biotech team that needs sharp scientific judgement in the hiring process, not just outbound sourcing. We are most useful when the brief is technical, the market is small, and each interview slot matters.
One call. Thirty minutes. We map the scientific gap, tell you who you need, and you commit to nothing until the shortlist is real.
30 minutes · No commitment · No upfront fee